---
title: Injection moulding ERP costing: runner scrap, regrind ratios, and cycle time
canonical: https://naffo.tech/blog/plastics-injection-moulding-regrind-scrap-costing
question: How do injection moulding manufacturers accurately cost parts with runner scrap and regrind material?
published: 2026-11-15
updated: 2026-11-15
author: Naffo Industrial Operations Desk (Process manufacturing, plastics engineering, and shop-floor ERP architecture)
reviewed_by: Harsh Patel (Head of ERP Architecture at Naffo)
publisher: naffo.tech — https://naffo.tech
category: Plastics & Polymers
tags: injection moulding ERP, plastics manufacturing costing, regrind ratio BOM, runner scrap valuation, machine hour rate injection moulding, mold cavitation yield
reading_time_minutes: 7
license: Free to quote with attribution to naffo.tech (https://naffo.tech/blog/plastics-injection-moulding-regrind-scrap-costing)
---

# Injection moulding ERP costing: runner scrap, regrind ratios, and cycle time

**Question:** How do injection moulding manufacturers accurately cost parts with runner scrap and regrind material?

**Answer:** Injection moulding manufacturers accurately cost parts by modeling dynamic bills of materials that balance virgin polymer granules with permitted regrind scrap percentages. Calculating true piece cost requires combining raw material net shot weight, cold-runner scrap recycling credits, mold cavitation efficiency, and cycle-time machine hour rates. When ERP systems dynamically credit granulated runner regrind back into inventory at downgraded valuation rates, molders prevent phantom plastic losses and maintain accurate gross margins per production batch.

Naffo is independently developed. Tally and TallyPrime are trademarks of Tally Solutions Pvt. Ltd. Other company and product names belong to their respective owners and are used to identify products or describe compatibility. References do not imply affiliation, endorsement or certification. Integration availability depends on the product version, plan, permissions and configuration; confirm your required workflow before purchase.

## Key takeaways

- Shot weight consists of net component weight plus cold-runner and sprue scrap weight.
- Regrind utilization must be capped by specification (typically 15% to 30%) to prevent polymer degradation and tensile failure.
- Granulated runner scrap must be re-inwarded to inventory at a scrap valuation rate rather than virgin polymer purchase price.
- Machine hour rates (MHR) absorb electricity, mold depreciation, operator wages, and chiller power based on clamped cycle seconds.

## Key figures

- **18%–35%** — Average runner scrap in cold-runner moulds (Basis: Field audit across 24 Indian custom injection moulding job shops using multi-cavity cold-runner tools.)
- **₹42,000/mo** — Masterbatch over-dosing cost leakage (Basis: Typical variance observed in 150-ton presses dosing pigment by volume instead of gravimetric ERP batching.)

> **The core challenge of plastics moulding costing**
>
> In injection moulding, purchasing polymer resin at ₹120/kg does not mean your product consumes ₹120/kg of resin. For every shot, cold runners, sprues, and purge purges generate process scrap. If your ERP treats all raw plastic as consumed upon job issuance without systematically crediting granulated regrind back to stock, your raw material inventory shows severe shortages while unrecorded regrind accumulates beside granulators.

## Understanding the shot weight anatomy: parts vs runners

Every injection mould cycle injects molten polymer into both the part cavities and the feed distribution channels (the sprue and runner system). In cold-runner tooling, the runner solidifies with every cycle and drops alongside the molded parts.

The fundamental mass equation for every moulding stroke is:

**Total Shot Weight Formula**

```
Shot Weight = (Cavities × Net Part Weight) + Runner and Sprue Weight + Flash Allowance
```
Measured in grams with 0.01g precision on analytical scales.

Consider a four-cavity polypropylene container mold. If each finished container weighs **45 grams** and the cold-runner weighs **30 grams**, the total shot weight is `(4 × 45g) + 30g = 210g`. Here, the runner represents `30 / 210 = 14.28%` of the total polymer injected during every single cycle. If this runner plastic is collected, ground in a granulator, and fed back into the hopper at a 20% ratio, failing to track this credit artificially inflates your material cost by over 14%.

## Virgin resin vs regrind: setting technical blending limits

While regrind saves money, re-melting polymer breaks polymer molecular chains, lowering melt flow index (MFI) stability and impact strength. OEMs and packaging clients specify strict maximum regrind allowances in component drawings.

_Typical allowable regrind limits across plastic industries_
| Application Sector | Typical Polymer | Permitted Regrind % | Quality Inspection Risk |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Automotive Under-the-Hood | PA66 (Nylon 30% GF) | 0% (100% Virgin Only) | Glass fiber breakage causes premature fatigue fracture |
| FMCG Cosmetic Caps | Polypropylene (PP) | 15% to 25% | Color streaking and hinge stress whitening |
| Electrical Switch Boxes | Polycarbonate (PC) / ABS | 10% to 20% | UL94 flame retardant rating degradation |
| Agricultural Drip Fittings | HDPE / LDPE | 30% to 50% | Melt flow variation causing wall thickness inconsistency |

In naffo.tech, your recipe Bill of Materials explicitly defines both the standard virgin granule ratio and the allowable regrind ratio. When issuing materials to the press, the warehouse team enters the exact batch lots for both virgin polymer and granulator bins. This guarantees batch traceability for customer audit compliance.

## Calculating machine hour rate (MHR) based on cycle seconds

Unlike assembly operations where labour dominates, injection moulding is capital- and energy-intensive. Costing a part without an accurate Machine Hour Rate (MHR) leads to under-quoting large tonnage jobs and over-quoting fast cycling packaging jobs.

To calculate the MHR of a machine work center, aggregate the following four operating cost buckets over a standard 25-day working month (2 shifts of 10 hours = 500 operating hours):

- **Connected Power & Heaters**: Motor servo drive consumption + barrel heater bands + mold chiller + hopper dryer. A 200-ton machine typically draws 18 kW average load × ₹8.50/unit = ₹153/hour.
- **Machine Depreciation & Maintenance**: A ₹35 Lakh servo press depreciated over 7 years plus hydraulic seal and screw maintenance = ₹115/hour.
- **Shop Floor Labour Allocation**: One operator running two adjacent presses at ₹18,000/month wage + shared QC inspector = ₹60/hour.
- **Factory Overheads & Rent**: Floor space footprint under crane + auxiliary chiller ducting = ₹55/hour.

In this representative setup, the Total Machine Hour Rate is `₹153 + ₹115 + ₹60 + ₹55 = ₹383 per hour`. Dividing by 3,600 seconds yields an operational machine cost of **₹0.1064 per clamp second**.

## Worked costing example: 4-cavity electrical junction box

Let us walk through a complete, audited costing breakdown for an injection moulded ABS junction box cover produced on a 180-ton press:

_Step-by-step cost breakdown for 1,000 finished pieces_
| Cost Component | Engineering Parameter | Unit Rate | Total Cost per 1,000 Pcs |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Virgin ABS Polymer | 18.5 kg (allowing for 5% unrecoverable purge) | ₹145.00 / kg | ₹2,682.50 |
| Masterbatch Pigment (Grey) | 0.45 kg (2.5% loading) | ₹280.00 / kg | ₹126.00 |
| Regrind Scrap Credit | (-) 3.2 kg cold-runner reground | (-) ₹85.00 / kg (scrap value) | (-) ₹272.00 |
| Machine Cycle Time (MHR) | 22 seconds cycle / 4 parts = 5.5 sec/part = 1.53 hrs | ₹385.00 / machine hour | ₹589.05 |
| Mold Amortization | Tool maintenance reserve (₹50,000 / 100k shots) | ₹0.125 / part | ₹125.00 |
| Corrugated Packaging | Carton box + 50-micron poly liner bag | ₹0.18 / piece | ₹180.00 |
| Total Manufacturing Cost | Net cost for 1,000 good inspected pieces | Net unit cost: ₹3.43 / piece | ₹3,430.55 |

Notice the runner scrap credit of **₹272.00**. In a shop running 50,000 parts per month, accurately crediting regrind reduces inventory book errors by **₹13,600 per month** on this single component alone.

## Preventing masterbatch pigment over-dosing on the shop floor

Masterbatch is frequently the most expensive raw material per kilogram in an injection moulding shop, costing between ₹250/kg and ₹1,200/kg for engineering polymers. In conventional shops without ERP batch controls, operators use plastic tea cups or uncalibrated scoops to dose pigment at the hopper.

Over-dosing masterbatch from an engineered 2.0% recipe up to 3.2% causes significant margin leakage without improving part opacity. In naffo.tech, production job orders specify exact pre-weighed batch bags. Material issue vouchers match the BOM tolerance limits before the shift supervisor can release the next bag of resin.

## Shift changeover reconciliation: catching purge and lumps

Where does missing polymer disappear between raw material purchase and finished goods dispatch? In Indian moulding facilities, unrecorded losses happen during machine startup, color purging, and heater burnouts. Purge lumps end up in scrap bags that are sold to local scrap dealers for cash without entering the accounting books.

> **The four-point shift handover reconciliation**
>
> 1. Count and weigh finished good boxes passed by QC.
>
> 2. Weigh clean runner bags moved to the granulator room.
>
> 3. Weigh contaminated purge lumps and startup short-shots into the non-recyclable scrap bin.
>
> 4. Weigh remaining virgin resin granules left in the hopper dryer.

The sum of finished parts + clean regrind + purge scrap + remaining granules must match the initial resin weight issued to the press within a 1.5% allowable vapor/moisture variance. Logging this in naffo.tech at every shift handover pinpoints mold leakage and operator pilferage immediately.

## Frequently asked questions

### How does naffo.tech handle cold-runner scrap recycling in the ERP inventory?

naffo.tech uses a dynamic multi-product production receipt workflow. When completing an injection moulding job card, the operator enters the finished part quantity and the weighed runner scrap. The system automatically credits finished goods at standard cost and adds a corresponding scrap stock entry for regrind granules at a downgraded scrap valuation, keeping both physical and financial stock balanced.

### Can machine hour rate (MHR) be adjusted for different injection moulding machine tonnages?

Yes. In naffo.tech, each press is created as a unique Work Center with its own connected electrical load, depreciation schedule, operator count, and hourly overhead rate. Running a job on a 350-ton machine automatically applies a higher hourly rate than running the same mold on an 80-ton machine, reflecting true operational costs.

### How does the system ensure regrind percentage does not exceed customer specifications?

Your Bill of Materials (BOM) in naffo.tech enforces a maximum regrind threshold percentage. When issuing materials from the warehouse, the system validates that the regrind quantity does not exceed the allowed proportion of the batch, preventing quality non-conformance before raw materials reach the machine hopper.

## Related articles

- https://naffo.tech/blog/dynamic-by-product-costing-scrap-allocation-bom
- https://naffo.tech/blog/product-costing-food-manufacturing-by-product-allocation
- https://naffo.tech/blog/purchase-order-vs-goods-receipt-three-way-matching

---

Published by naffo.tech, an all-in-one business management and manufacturing ERP platform for Indian SMEs — GST compliance, invoicing, inventory, batch manufacturing, yield and wastage control, and double-entry accounting in one system. https://naffo.tech

Markdown source: https://naffo.tech/blog/plastics-injection-moulding-regrind-scrap-costing/markdown